Tuesday, April 20, 2010

"Erratum" definded is an error in writing or printing. A book with a blank page, a news letter with several missing lines. In current day there are clearly defined instructions to how a person must scan a page to a computer to obtain the entire page. If done incorrectly parts of the page with be missing and the scan copy leaving it incomplete. What if some of the most prollific authors and stories of our time and before are missing the instructions and somehow left out a line or two, a page or two, or more. How would this effect our culture as humans? Would it change the direction of our society if we found out that some of our history as incomplete. You wonder what authors or stories could cause such a dramatic change if found false. Would the Declaration of independence being incomplete change things or even more universal the Bible. What kind of affect would this draw into our communities. Who made the rules? Who is wrong or right? Who says that fate is not the governor and those missing words or lines or pages were mean to be.

"Erratum" 24"X48" acrylic, aerosol, wood stain, and sticker applications on wood Sold to the Kyriakioles Family.

Good or Evil?????

For my very first blog I figured I would throw out some of my personal concepts on this life in which we all lead. I came across a friend of mines website http://www.okanom.com/ and noticed a brief interaction he calls “balancing of the shades” I really appreciated the concept and I wanted to expand on this a little with my own thoughts. Okulus Anomali states that there is no good or evil that is it a concept developed by man. Now for starts I could have a completely different view on the subject it’s just my expanse, two this expanse is mine it’s not political, religious or such so if you start to get upset you should probably take a step back and think about it more.

Are good and evil truly opposites or is one just more defined in our culture then the other? In history many thing have been set as evil do to the lack of knowledge on the subject then at a later date reborn as positive. Clearly by definitions good, or light or better defined then evil or dark by more then 60%. Why? Is it because it’s easier to swallow? Or is it because one has to put less mental work toward the conclusion? So clearly if this is the case then there may be some things classified as evil that may not be based on lack of information and there may be something classified as good that may have wrong information guiding it. There is a fine line between exploration and descending into the information that may be evil. Sometime this exploration or descending can cause more damage then bringing sometime new to light. But how would we know without this exploring? How far is to far if no one tests it, hell tee art was square till someone sailed it. Two cups are cups, less defined. One may be filled with poison and one with water but until tested they remain two cups no matter what there contains.